Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Artículos

No. 30 (2026): Kalpana- Revista de Investigación

Governance and concurrent legal competence in tourism management in Mexico

Submitted
March 3, 2026
Published
2026-07-10

Abstract

Tourism in Mexico operates within a federal system that recognizes concurrent competencies among federal, state, and municipal authorities. However, the multiplicity of regulations affecting tourism activities and the administrative and fiscal concentration at the federal level create tensions in territorial policy implementation. This study analyzes the legal framework governing tourism in Mexico from the perspective of normative hierarchy, concurrent competence, and regulatory transversality, assessing its implications for governance and sustainable development. The research follows a qualitative doctrinal legal approach based on systematic analysis of the Mexican Constitution, the General Tourism Law, and related federal legislation, complemented by a review of specialized literature on fiscal federalism, multilevel governance, and tourism policy. Findings indicate that although the constitutional design allows intergovernmental coordination, centralized dynamics and regulatory fragmentation hinder integrated sectoral management. Normative harmonization and institutional strengthening at the state and municipal levels are essential to consolidate a more balanced and effective tourism governance model.

References

  1. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
  2. Azuela, A. (2006). Visionarios y pragmáticos: una aproximación sociológica al derecho ambiental. México: UNAM.
  3. Bramwell, B., & Lane, B. (2011). Critical research on the governance of tourism and sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4–5), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.580586
  4. Cabrero, E. (2004). Capacidades institucionales en gobiernos subnacionales de México. México: CIDE.
  5. Carbonell, M. (2014). El federalismo en México. México: Porrúa.
  6. Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. (1917). Diario Oficial de la Federación.
  7. Dredge, D., & Jenkins, J. (2007). Tourism planning and policy. Brisbane: John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Falleti, T. G. (2010). Decentralization and subnational politics in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Hall, C. M. (2011). A typology of governance and its implications for tourism policy analysis. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4–5), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.570346
  10. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000649
  11. Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. Sage Publications.
  12. Merino, M. (2013). Políticas públicas: ensayo sobre la intervención del Estado en la solución de problemas públicos. México: CIDE.
  13. Ley General de Turismo. (2009). Diario Oficial de la Federación.
  14. Ley General del Equilibrio Ecológico y la Protección al Ambiente. (1988). Diario Oficial de la Federación.
  15. Ley General de Cambio Climático. (2012). Diario Oficial de la Federación.
  16. Ley Federal de Protección al Consumidor. (1992). Diario Oficial de la Federación.
  17. Ley Federal sobre Monumentos y Zonas Arqueológicos, Artísticos e Históricos. (1972). Diario Oficial de la Federación.
  18. Ley de Migración. (2011). Diario Oficial de la Federación.
  19. Ley de Aviación Civil. (1995). Diario Oficial de la Federación.
  20. Ley de Caminos, Puentes y Autotransporte Federal. (1993). Diario Oficial de la Federación.
  21. Oates, W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120–1149. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.3.1120
  22. Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2000). Governance, politics and the state. London: Macmillan.
  23. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
  24. Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Gill, N. (2003). The global trend towards devolution and its implications. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 21(3), 333–351.
  25. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Sage Publications.
  26. Sharpley, R. (2014). Tourism: A vehicle for development? Channel View Publications.